Stoke-on-Trent, England - home of the North Staffordshire Potteries | ||
| Index for Royal Coat of Arms on Pottery |
English (North Staffordshire) Potters use of the Royal Coat of Arms
previous: pre & post 1837
Arms
next: American potters use of the Arms
Examples of the use of the Royal Arms on pottery manufacturers marks.
The Royal Arms may only be used legitimately by businesses which are holders of a Royal Warrant. Nowadays Royal Warrants are granted to people or companies who have regularly supplied goods or services for a minimum of five consecutive years to members of the Royal Family.
However in the late 19th and early 20th century many potters who did not have a Warrant (both in England and also foreign firms) also used the Arms (or some similar design) as part of their mark - to gain some sense of importance and value.In the same way many potters used the name "Royal" as part of their name or trade mark as in 'Royal Patent', 'Royal Ironstone China'
Use of the pre-1837 British Royal Coat of Arms with the additional centre shield in the main shield:
From 1801 the arms of England occupied the first and fourth quarters, the arms of Scotland the second, and the arms of Ireland the third. For the house of Hanover, there was an escutcheon overall (centre shield).
In 1837, the Hanoverian escutcheon and crown were removed because Queen Victoria, as a woman, was unable to succeed to the throne of Hanover under Hanoverian law.
impressed mark 'Elkin, Knight & Co' with crown above |
|
|
|
|
Hicks & Meigh marks often didn't have the manufacturers name. |
the mark incorporates the Royal Arms and the Stafford Knot
|
in the centre of the mark is the one of the mottos of the Royal Arms and the symbols of the four nations of England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland
|
|
Examples of the use of the post 1837 British Royal Coat of Arms:
this mark appears with and without the manufacturers name |
Samuel Alcock & Co |
|
|
|
|
|
these
belt and arms marks both appear on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holland
& Green operated 1854-81 and therefore should have used the arms
without the central small shield - however they continued the mark of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printed
mark - usually accompanied by an impressed mark bearing the name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Godden - Encyclopaedia of British Pottery and Porcelain Marks |
|
|
|
|
| Index
for Royal Coat of Arms on Pottery |
Questions, comments, contributions? email: Steve
Birks